15 Comments

    1. Yes! but it’s response time will be slower, on purpose. You’ll need to suspend it in the ice for longer to get an accurate reading.

  1. Thank you for going the extra mile to write this piece. So much attention to detail. It’s not only informative, but also really well written.

  2. Thanks, a very informative white paper regarding the ins and outs of temperature calibrations. I look forward to my new RFX instrument.

  3. “temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules in an object and cannot be measured directly. Instead, thermometers measure temperature indirectly, by actually measuring other physical phenomena that change as temperature changes.”

    In a LiG thermometer, the height of the indicating liquid changes with density, which varies with the mean kinetic energy of the atoms (Hg) or molecules (ethanol) of the liquid.
    density ρ = m/V
    mean kinetic energy K = 1/2mv²
    Isolating m and equating: ρV = 2K/v²
    ρ=2K/Vv²
    Density of a liquid is a direct measure of the molecular mean kinetic energy.
    ∆ρ=m/∆V; ∆V=m/∆ρ
    The reading on a LiG thermometer, determined by ∆V = m/∆ρ, is a direct indication of ∆ρ and therefore a direct indicator of ∆K.
    An exactly analogous density argument can be made for a bimetal strip thermometer.
    Temperature is thus read directly, not by measuring other phenomena.
    The other phenomena do not change with temperature. They change with kinetic energy.
    Temperature is a direct indicator of the kinetic energy of the thermometric material. This will also be true of a PRT or a thermistor.
    Measured temperature is determined by the thermometric scale on a thermometer. Therefore, temperature is defined as the reading of a thermometer.
    Thermometers measure temperature directly. They measure K indirectly.

    1. If you want to split hairs in that way, that’s fine. But it’s dependent on a definition of temperature as being “that which a thermometer measures,” which is not a very good definition. I have consulted with our Chief Metrologist, who was the former Metrology at Fluke, and he even showed me a whole BBC documentary about the quest for direct temperature measurement. But beyond that, everything you’ve described there is literally measuring a secondary phenomenon. Yes, every one of them has a direct correlation with the kinetic energy of the molecules. Yes, density is bound directly with temperature, but the expansion of alcohol or mercury or a bi-metallic strip IS a secondary measurement. We have found ways to cleverly correlate those things with the desired quanta we seek to measure, but a measurement of density is a measurement of density, not a direct measurement of kinetic energy, which is what temperature is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.